Skip to content

record: health-conductor-stale-verdict shipped (PyAutoBrain#199) - #131

Merged
Jammy2211 merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
claude/health-conductor-stale-verdict-6ve1sl
Aug 5, 2026
Merged

record: health-conductor-stale-verdict shipped (PyAutoBrain#199)#131
Jammy2211 merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
claude/health-conductor-stale-verdict-6ve1sl

Conversation

@Jammy2211

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Mind state for the health-conductor STALE fix, now merged as
PyAutoBrain#199
(issue PyAutoBrain#198).

The prompt walks its full lifecycle in this branch: filed under draft/bug/pyautobrain/,
advanced to active/ when the issue was created, and folded into the dated completion
record on merge.

  • complete/2026/08/health-conductor-stale-verdict.md — the rich record, carrying the
    findings worth keeping: why STALE takes exit code 6 and not the free slot 1
    (1 is the shell's own generic failure and STALE passes the dev-ship gate, so a
    crash must never be readable as a pass); why a stale reason is not a
    baseline-gap (that bucket renders as "accept, not action items", while re-running
    the named check is the action); that refresh commands are grounded like fix
    topics, never invented; and that Heart itself needed no change — the tier was
    computed and exported correctly, the consumer was the risk surface.
  • active/health_conductor_stale_verdict.md removed and its active.md section
    dropped (the dated record is the ledger).
  • complete/index.md regenerated (892 records). lifecycle.py check: OK.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01FbLrcRCmUvhRQdtZbDWMDD


Generated by Claude Code

@Jammy2211
Jammy2211 merged commit 87af58b into main Aug 5, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants